<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I Learned to Stop Worrying About International Law and Love Toothless Inquiries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/02/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-international-law-and-love-toothless-inquiries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/02/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-international-law-and-love-toothless-inquiries/</link>
	<description>McGill&#039;s Blog on International Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Hodgins</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/02/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-international-law-and-love-toothless-inquiries/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Hodgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/?p=734#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your response. I attempted to outline the &quot;overwhelming evidence&quot; of a breach of international law in the body of the article, though perhaps I should have made this clearer. The evidence is clear that the Foreign Minister&#039;s top two legal advisors, as well as (initially) the Attorney General himself told those responsible for taking Britain to war that such an action would be illegal, because their pretext (Resolution 1441) did not authorize such an action.

Other world leaders (mentioned in the article) have been charged by the ICC despite their not having had such comprehensive and unambiguous legal advice about the international law they were breaking. The fact that these leaders come from poor counties led to my snide assertions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your response. I attempted to outline the &#8220;overwhelming evidence&#8221; of a breach of international law in the body of the article, though perhaps I should have made this clearer. The evidence is clear that the Foreign Minister&#8217;s top two legal advisors, as well as (initially) the Attorney General himself told those responsible for taking Britain to war that such an action would be illegal, because their pretext (Resolution 1441) did not authorize such an action.</p>
<p>Other world leaders (mentioned in the article) have been charged by the ICC despite their not having had such comprehensive and unambiguous legal advice about the international law they were breaking. The fact that these leaders come from poor counties led to my snide assertions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmyson</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/02/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-international-law-and-love-toothless-inquiries/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/?p=734#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if you took a break from your snide assertions concerning wealth and the rule of law, you could expound upon the &quot;overwhelming evidence&quot; beyond accusing a few lawyers of flip-flopping and façile comparisons between international and interpersonal standards of law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if you took a break from your snide assertions concerning wealth and the rule of law, you could expound upon the &#8220;overwhelming evidence&#8221; beyond accusing a few lawyers of flip-flopping and façile comparisons between international and interpersonal standards of law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

