<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Pluralism &#8211; A Primer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/06/legal-pluralism-a-primer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/06/legal-pluralism-a-primer/</link>
	<description>McGill&#039;s Blog on International Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Oomen</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/06/legal-pluralism-a-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Oomen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/?p=1096#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>good overview. You might want to refer to recent publications on global legal pluralism as well, fi Michaels, Ralph. 2009. Global Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2009 (5):243-262.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good overview. You might want to refer to recent publications on global legal pluralism as well, fi Michaels, Ralph. 2009. Global Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2009 (5):243-262.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avidan Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/06/legal-pluralism-a-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Avidan Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/?p=1096#comment-896</guid>
		<description>Excellent post Nafay. “Legal pluralism is a fact” - Agreed. Any pluralism brings about conflicts. It would be interesting though to read a similar post re the next stage, where the legal systems start to fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post Nafay. “Legal pluralism is a fact” &#8211; Agreed. Any pluralism brings about conflicts. It would be interesting though to read a similar post re the next stage, where the legal systems start to fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

