Israel’s other refugee question

This past August, visiting Israel for the first time and staying with a friend in south Tel Aviv, I was immediately struck by the number of African faces I saw in her neighbourhood. These Africans, I was informed, were migrants mostly from Eritrea, Darfur, and Southern Sudan (now the Republic of South Sudan) who were seeking protection in Israel under the 1951 Refugee Convention. You see, until that point, my knowledge of Israel’s refugee issues extended only to the question of the right of return of the Palestinians expelled in 1948 and their descendants. As a “final status” issue in Palestinian-Israeli negotiations and one that cuts to the core of the national identities of both factions, it is easy to understand how this new class of African refugees can escape the attention of human rights lawyers and advocates abroad.

I was in Israel taking part in a program on law and internal diversity, a partnership of McGill and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, so thankfully I was able to explore Israel’s refugee policies in greater detail in a course on migration and diversity. For conceptual clarity, an asylum seekers is a person who is making a claim under the Refugee Convention and and a refugee is one whose claim has been accepted by the receiving country. It is notoriously difficult to collect statistics on migration flows,…

Continue reading this entry ➔

An Interview with South African Refugee Lawyer Fatima Khan

Professor Fatima Khan is a refugee lawyer and the Executive Director of the University of Cape Town Refugee Law Clinic. The clinic is funded by United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), the University of Cape Town, the Atlantic Philanthropies and the Sigrid Rausing Trust. The clinic houses a centre for applied research, and has provided legal assistance to refugees and asylum seekers since 1998.  Ms. Khan lectures on Refugee Law to undergraduate and graduate students at the University of Cape Town, and is currently editing and co-authoring a bound volume that will analyze refugee legislation in various global jurisdictions.

[You may stream or podcast a 20 minute interview with Ms. Khan here]

Philip Duguay: You are a scholar who studies interpretation of international refugee law across various national jurisdictions. Where does South Africa lie on the spectrum in terms of its acceptance and implementation of the 1951 UN Convention on the Status of Refugees? In other words, how much weight does the Convention carry in South African case law?

Fatima Khan: The Convention carries a lot of weight in terms of South African law. The entire Convention has been accepted into South African law. However, I must say that South African refugee law is far more progressive and advanced than the…

Continue reading this entry ➔