Re-defining Disability in South Africa: The Social Assistance Amendment Bill

The Social Assistance Amendment Bill introduced in the South African Parliament last month has revealed fissures in government policy and has opened up debate on how this country handles disability issues. A key concern for some is that South Africa does not have centralized disability legislation. There are however, several different pieces of legislation and government policy that treat disability issues, such as the Social Assistance Act of 2004, the Employment Equity Act of 1998, and the Integrated National Disability Strategy of 1997, among others. This is not unusual, as countries such as Canada do not have dedicated national disability legislation. However, because the various pieces of South African legislation use different definitions of the term disability, this can create confusion, particularly when disabled persons are applying for government-provided financial assistance. Major criticisms of the bill are that it is still not clear enough, and that it does almost nothing to help move South Africa away from a medical model of disability, towards a social model that would promote societal inclusion for persons with disabilities.

South Africa signed and ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its optional protocol in 2007. Furthermore, the South African Constitution specifically enshrines equality for persons with disabilities under Article 9(3). Yet, it is not clear how the current bill will take this nation closer to full implementation of the Constitution and the Convention. While the Deputy Minister of…

Continue reading this entry ➔

The International Trade in Policing and Security Models: Should it be Subject to Public International Law?

Private security has been a huge global business since the 1980’s. This is particularly true in South Africa, where a society traumatized by the Apartheid era is still dealing with the fallout from years of high policing and repressive governance strategies. Models of ‘policing’ have been imported into South Africa, and exported from this nation, since before the fall of Apartheid.

The term ‘policing’ here is used in a broad sense. While most people associate the term with the state police (that is, publicly funded policing bodies) the reality is that our day to day lives are made secure in a variety of different fashions: through urban architecture, private security firms, technological methods and neighbourhood watch groups, among other forms of security governance. Clifford Shearing of the University of Cape Town has written extensively on this phenomenon. He recognizes the fact that “the new players in policing are not part of formal government. As a result, governments, especially governments of nation-states, have lost their monopoly on policing.”[1] Shearing and his colleagues note that this is not necessarily a bad thing. Rather, governments should be aware of this phenomenon when drafting security regulation.

However, many dangers lurk when wading into this subject. Do international security firms subvert state security by threatening the development of state structures that can more adequately take into account overall economic and social development goals? Furthermore, does the state lose legitimacy…

Continue reading this entry ➔

An Interview with South African Refugee Lawyer Fatima Khan

Professor Fatima Khan is a refugee lawyer and the Executive Director of the University of Cape Town Refugee Law Clinic. The clinic is funded by United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), the University of Cape Town, the Atlantic Philanthropies and the Sigrid Rausing Trust. The clinic houses a centre for applied research, and has provided legal assistance to refugees and asylum seekers since 1998.  Ms. Khan lectures on Refugee Law to undergraduate and graduate students at the University of Cape Town, and is currently editing and co-authoring a bound volume that will analyze refugee legislation in various global jurisdictions.

[You may stream or podcast a 20 minute interview with Ms. Khan here]

Philip Duguay: You are a scholar who studies interpretation of international refugee law across various national jurisdictions. Where does South Africa lie on the spectrum in terms of its acceptance and implementation of the 1951 UN Convention on the Status of Refugees? In other words, how much weight does the Convention carry in South African case law?

Fatima Khan: The Convention carries a lot of weight in terms of South African law. The entire Convention has been accepted into South African law. However, I must say that South African refugee law is far more progressive and advanced than the Convention, which is in my view a ‘Euro-centric’ document. The definition of the refugee in South African law, for example, is far more extensive than the…

Continue reading this entry ➔

South Africa will Strain to Reach its Commitments to the UNFCCC

The last several years have provided for challenging times in South Africa. The country is struggling to find its place in the world in the post-Apartheid age. President Jacob Zuma’s recent State of the Nation address was long on rhetoric, mainly that which extolled the accomplishments of Nelson Mandela (who made a rare public appearance that evening) and the stewardship of the slightly rusty ruling African National Congress party. However, he said very little in the speech to help lay out a firm strategy for economic and social success.

One of the greatest problems in South Africa is that outside of major urban centres the population has only limited access to reliable energy sources. This flies in the face of South Africa’s international energy commitments because ESKOM, which nearly holds a complete monopoly in South African energy production, also provides 45% of the entire continent’s electricity. Of course, this is ‘the dark continent’[1], but South Africans are feeling a power pinch as export demands have been met at the expense of domestic power shortages.

After hosting the World Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002, South Africa made strong legal commitments to reduce its carbon footprint via the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Kyoto Protocol entered into force here in 2005. Despite a rocky start, the South African government recently announced major plans to reduce emissions.

Interestingly, Article 24 of the South African Constitution…

Continue reading this entry ➔

South Africa’s ‘Zimbabwe Problem’ – International Law vs. Soccer

Driving around the Cape Peninsula in South Africa, tourists are bound to run into street side hawkers trying to unload cheaply made pieces of “African” art – at least some of which are apparently made in China. Entering into a conversation with these traders, one quickly finds they are often not South African, but from Zimbabwe. The Republic of South Africa is awash with these economic migrants, many of whom have entered the nation illegally. The rash of xenophobic attacks here in 2008 makes it obvious that the local population does not appreciate the presence of so many illegal aliens in South Africa. After all, this is a nation with a lot of race issue to begin with, and unemployment rates hovering around fifty percent.

Ideally, South Africa’s partnership in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) means that such migrants may have a right to be here – at least on a limited basis. Article 5 of the SADC Treaty calls for the “the progressive elimination of obstacles to the free movement of capital and labour, goods and services, and of the people of the Region generally….” Article 2 of the SADC Draft Protocol on Facilitation of the Movement of Persons aims to allow citizens free movement within the group of member states. With that in mind, the interpretation of South African immigration and refugee law can also lend itself to the theory that an…

Continue reading this entry ➔